Quantifying Economic Reasoning in Court: Judge Economics Sophistication and Pro-business Orientation
Title:
Quantifying Economic Reasoning in Court: Judge Economics Sophistication and Pro-business Orientation
Author(s):
Siying Cao
Year of Publishing:
2021
Publisher:
Working Paper
Abstract:

By applying computational linguistics tools to the analysis of US federal district courts' decisions from 1932 to 2016, this paper quantifies the rise of economic reasoning in court cases that range from securities regulation to antitrust law. I then relate judges' level of economic reasoning to their training. I find that significant judge heterogeneity in economics sophistication can be explained by attendance at law schools that have a large presence of the law and economics faculty. Finally, for all regulatory cases from 1970 to 2016, I hand code whether the judge ruled in favor of the business or the government. I find that judge economics sophistication is positively correlated with a higher frequency of pro-business decisions even after controlling for political ideology and a rich set of other judge covariates.

More Research From These Scholars

Zheng Song, Michael Koenig, Kjetil Storesletten, Fabrizio Zilibotti,

We construct an endogenous growth model with random interactions where firms are subject to distortions. The TFP distribution evolves endogenously as firms seek to upgrade their technology over time either by innovating or by imitating other firms....

Hao Geng, Ce (Matthew) Shi, Zheng Song,

This report employs detailed transaction records from AlipayHK to evaluate the effectiveness of the 2021 Hong Kong Consumption Voucher scheme. We use a difference-in-differences (DID) design that compares the change in the spending of the voucher recipients...